May 1, 2012 — 852 views
Appeals Court Permits Lawsuit For Retaliation Against Individual Education Office Managers
On April 26, 2012, the California Fourth Appellate District in San Diego ruled that the anti-retaliation provision of the Reporting by School Employees of Improper Governmental Activities Act does not exempt management employees from liability, where those employees act in a supervisory capacity when they retaliate.
On April 26, 2012, the California Fourth Appellate District in San Diego ruled that the anti-retaliation provision of the Reporting by School Employees of Improper Governmental Activities Act does not exempt management employees from liability, where those employees act in a supervisory capacity when they retaliate (Hartnett v Crosier).
Rodger Hartnett worked as a claims coordinator in the San Diego County Office of Education’s risk management department. He was discharged for incompetence, insubordination, and dishonesty. He believed that he was actually fired in retaliation for disclosing that several colleagues referred the Education Office’s legal business to friends and family in exchange for unlawful benefits, including discounted personal legal services. So, he sued them individually for retaliation in violation of Education Code §44113(a). He also sought punitive damages and attorney fees under Education Code §44114(c).
This Act bars “an employee” from using his or her official position to retaliate against “any person” to deter the person from making a disclosure of wrongdoing covered by the Act, which includes public expenditures.
At issue was whether the individual defendants were “employees” such that the statute prohibited their alleged retaliatory acts and permitted a civil action against them. “Employee” means a person employed by a public school employer except, among others, management employees. Management employees are those with significant responsibilities for formulating policies or administering programs.
The individuals prevailed initially, when a judge concluded the Act did not apply to them because they were management employees.
The appellate court found that ruling erroneous because the individual managers were also supervisory employees under California Government Code §3540.1(m). The San Diego court relied heavily on a two-year old Northern California published opinion (Conn v. WPUSD), which concluded that Section 44113 does not exempt management employees from liability if those managers were acting as supervisory employees when they committed the allegedly retaliatory acts. Consequently, persons who exercise supervisory authority over personnel actions will be liable when that authority is used to interfere with a school employee’s rights to report suspected wrongdoing under Education Code §§44110-44114.
The court rejected the individual defendants’ argument that Conn was wrongly decided. The legislative history indicated the California School Employees Association sponsored the legislation to give public school employees protections similar to those provided to state employees under the California Whistleblower Protection Act.
The court further declined to “exempt from liability those most likely and able to retaliate against public school employees who made protected disclosures — thwarting the Act’s very purpose.”
And finally, the court thoroughly rejected the individuals’ reliance on a 2008 decision by the California Supreme Court, which held that individual managers can’t be sued personally under the Fair Employment & Housing Act (FEHA). The applicable Education Code is modeled on the Whistleblower Protection Act (California Government Code §8547.2), which expressly authorizes individual liability for public employees who engage in retaliatory acts.
There is one positive for the individual defendants. As a management employee himself, Hartnett cannot recover punitive damages and attorneys fees under §44114(c). He can seek only compensation (lost income and emotional distress) and he still must actually prove that he was punished with termination in retaliation for “blowing the whistle,” and not for his own performance flaws and misconduct.
- Understand the breadth of the Reporting by School Employees of Improper Governmental Activities Act.
- Enact and then consistently enforce policies encouraging appropriate reporting of wrongdoing.
- Discipline anyone who engages in retaliatory behaviors.
- Educate administrators and managers.
About the Author
Patricia S. Eyres ("Patti") calls herself a "recovering litigator," who knows first-hand the value of paying attention to prevention. After spending 18 years defending companies in the courtroom, she resolved to help business leaders recognize potential legal landmines before they explode into lawsuits.
More articles by Patricia Eyres:
- Thorny FMLA Eligibility Issue: Counting Hours Worked To Meet the 1250 Hour Threshold
- Involuntary Reassignments And Transfers As An Unlawful Employment Practice
- Employer Alert: 2013 Legislative and Regulatory Expansion under California FEHA
- Performance Evaluations Without Pain ... And Without Lawsuits
- Trucking Company Pays $450,000 to Settle Fresno Workplace Discrimination Case
- Employers Have Affirmative Duty To Take Reasonable Steps To Prevent Harassment Or Discrimination
- Tenured Teacher Prevails On Claim that District Cannot Unilaterally Dismiss Charges
- EEOC Wins Rare Summary Judgment Verdict In Title VII Retaliation Case
- Court Puts To Rest Active Policing Of Employee Meal Periods
- Social Media And Hiring Practices
- California School Districts Liable For Sexual Harassment Of Students By Administrative Employees
- Workplace Retaliation: A Major Source Of Employer Exposure
- New Law Expands USERRA To Recognize Hostile Environment Harassment Claims
- Sexual Harrassment Training is Key to Risk Prevention
- New Legislation Affecting Employers in 2012
- Employers Must Prove A Lawful Reason For Denying Reinstatement After FMLA Leave
+ READ MORE about this author ...
- Share it with your social contacts (use the social sharing buttons at the top)
- Email it to your direct reports and colleagues (use the Email button at the top)
- Follow Patricia Eyres and/or the Workers Compensation topic to be notified when new articles are added
- Read related articles
- Add a comment or ask a question
Was This Article Helpful?
If so, you can follow Patricia Eyres and receive a notification (either in your feed reader or via email) whenever a new article by Patricia Eyres is published on InsuranceThoughtLeadership.com.
You can also follow the Workers Compensation Topic, either in your feed reader or via email notifications: