by Donna GalerMany directors know much too little about how to oversee the issue.
by Joe MarklandApple's HealthKit is the final piece to the puzzle: Healthcare providers will take the risk related to employees' health.
by Mark HymanMost doctors have little or no training in how to evaluate a patient's ability to work. They should begin by thinking through the potential risks.
by Jon PicoultHere are three tips for improving the experience and attracting customers -- while decreasing costs.
ITL is gathering the best ideas from the best thinkers on insurance and risk management to help steer the industry in important new directions. Some 350 thought leaders write on the ITL platform, including representatives from:
by Bret Shroyer
by John Chace
Jeff Pettegrew on History Of Insurance.
Editor's Note by Paul Carroll
As any regular reader of this site has seen, we have been running a number of articles challenging the basic assumptions that underlie the huge and growing wellness industry. I want to be sure everyone understands that we are not taking sides here. I have been requesting — practically begging for — someone on the pro-wellness side of the debate to either rebut the critical articles or to simply post articles that outline the benefits of wellness programs. I have promised to provide those articles the same play that we have given the critical ones and to let them run as long as the author feels is necessary. To date, I have had zero takers.
I will continue to send any critical articles to the major wellness vendors and brokers and to the Business Roundtable, which a recent Reuters article says is such a strong proponent of wellness that its members were considering using a meeting with President Obama to threaten to withhold support for the Affordable Care Act unless he got the EEOC to halt lawsuits saying that certain wellness programs violate the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). If anyone ever responds, you will know almost immediately.
In the meantime, I encourage you to check out some of the articles on our site about what, absent any defense, would seem to be a defenseless industry — or, at least, a defender-less industry. The most definitive challenge yet is this recent piece, Workplace Wellness Shows No Savings. It goes through the various types of studies on wellness and argues that all show a negative return on investment from wellness programs, despite lots of marketing claims to the contrary. The sternest article is CEOs Defy Common Sense on Wellness, which prompted my latest request for a response, from the Business Roundtable, on Dec. 1. The article argues that Business Roundtable members’ support for wellness can only be motivated by a desire to fire, or at least fine heavily, employees who might have been fired in the past but who are now protected by laws such as the ADA — a truly harsh charge that I, for one, hope is incorrect.
At ITL, our tagline is, “Welcome to the conversation,” but it’s hard to have a conversation on wellness if one side of the debate declines to talk. I hope that changes soon.
Paul is the CEO and editor-in-chief of Insurance Thought Leadership. He is also co-author of The New Killer Apps: How Large Companies Can Out-Innovate Start-Ups and Billion Dollar Lessons: What You Can Learn From the Most Inexcusable Business Failures of the Last 25 Years and the author of Big Blues: The Unmaking of IBM, a major best-seller published in 1993. Paul spent 17 years at the Wall Street Journal as an editor and reporter. The paper nominated him twice for Pulitzer Prizes. In 1996, he founded Context, a thought-leadership magazine on the strategic importance of information technology that was a finalist for the National Magazine Award for General Excellence. He is a co-founder of the Devil's Advocate Group consulting firm.
The ITL leadership team brings together a powerful mix of insurance-industry expertise, experience in publishing, and world-class editors, writers and marketers. And, of course, there’s you—the thought leaders whose ideas will shape the future of insurance and the readers who will implement many of those ideas.
There is a saying we subscribe to: “Nobody is as smart as everybody.” So, rather than have a staff of people try to report on all important developments in all parts of the complex world of insurance, we have created a platform where the smartest people can share their best ideas. Together, we will be smarter than any one expert or publication can be.
The short answer is: Because we can. The Internet and, in particular, social media have created ways of sharing ideas and communicating that weren’t possible back in the dark ages—think the early 1990s. And we all know that insurance needs help: The complexity is stunning. So, any way that we can simplify and streamline insurance will produce huge benefits.
We vet articles that are submitted to us, edit them in collaboration with the thought leaders who write them and then post articles here. We provide links so that readers can communicate with the thought leaders and draw on their expertise. Over time, we will add more video, webinars and other capabilities. The rest is up to you.
Today's Feature Video
An introduction to Insurance Thought Leadership