- Owners, as the sponsor of the program, assert control over claims under the insurance program, which can create tension with the insurance company and the contractors on the project.
- Brokers are increasingly sophisticated and acting as coverage advisors for the insureds to maximize recovery under the Owner Controlled Insurance Program policies.
- There are often differences between the insurance policy issued by the company and the coverage as represented to enrolled subcontractors.
- There is an increasing tendency for owners, brokers, and contractors to treat the Owner Controlled Insurance Program as a single program, a concept that is sometimes at odds with the concept of liability insurance.
- Inconsistencies between liability policy language, Owner Controlled Insurance Program manuals provided to contractors, and the actual subcontracts blur the definition of what is the governing Owner Controlled Insurance Program contract.
- Lack of complete enrollment by all subcontractors on the project or phase complicates the claims process and impacts the cost of the program.
- The timing of the inception of a "rolling wrap” can create hybrid liability claims that are partial wrap and partial non-wrap for purposes of a construction defect claim.
- Lack of sophistication by subcontractors and their counsel creates tension in the claims process.
Owner Controlled Insurance Program Liability Claims Challenges, Part 1
Owner Controlled Insurance Programs, or OCIPs, are the logical consequence of insurance underwriters and project owners trying to control costs and speed the resolution of construction-related insurance claims (including builders risk, workers compensation, and liability claims).|