Resilience & Sustainability

Traditional catastrophic climate risk models are built on an assumption that is known to be wrong and aren't designed for individual assets.

The on-demand model can relieve pressure by revolutionizing how the insurance industry responds to natural disasters.

Losses can be less obvious, more complicated and larger than the property claim. Unfortunately, the front-end focus is often wrong.

Myths often undercut the true dangers of flooding and leave home and business owners across the country woefully underprepared.

Last year's storms, fires and mudslides may have accelerated the insurance industry’s response to catastrophic events.

One of the first employer concerns has to be preventing and responding to employee injuries when a disaster occurs.

Flood and earthquake insurance work well at the macro level, but try to buy a policy, and you see the problems quickly.

He said “the annual probability of a U.S. mega-catastrophe causing $400 billion or more of insured losses is about 2%.” That is way too high.